Limited Visibility.
Many people, elitists and art appreciators alike, scoff at the idea of contemporary art. "Anyone could do it. It means nothing," they might say. However, to me, contemporary art is beautiful and powerful. With that said, I thoroughly enjoyed our excursion to the Contemporary Art Museum (CAM) of Raleigh and its exhibit, Limited Visibility. What does that even mean, limited visibility? The curator explains in her statement: "Voluntary omission, erasure, withholding, and concealment: these are the methods the artists in Limited Visibility employ in order to draw attention to that which is missing." In other words, the artist will intentionally omit certain aspects of their art in order to make a point: that something is wrong, something is missing, and we should be aware of it.
One particular piece was mesmerizing: Temple of One Thousand Bells.
This piece by Laura Belém displays one thousand delicate glass bells that were clapper-less. The artist used a melodic voice-over to narrate a wonderful tale of an explorer venturing to hear this wonderful lost symphony. The explorer would only hear the symphony once he stopped tuning his ears. He needed to be natural, relaxed, and comfortable in order to enjoy the music.
Another one of my favorite pieces was called, quite incredibly, Blind self portrait listening to the beetles while scratching a notched stick so to invoke, the universal magic of the power of destruction.
Created by Abraham Cruzvillegas, this piece may, at first glance, seem unremarkable besides its name. On the contrary! While its name is exceptionally descriptive, the art itself is exceptionally secretive. Behind each and every sheet of paper that is covered with acrylic paint lies a mystery. Lying under one sheet was a packet of sugar. Hidden by another was a picture of a tree. However, we were not allowed to touch any of the paper obstacles (so then, of course, my curiosity burned), and without our tour guide's explanation of the piece, we never would have known that anything was behind these inexplicable papers. And yet, I guess that is the nature of secrets: we don't always get to know them.
Side note: check out this (something that I think is one of the greatest works of literary expression ever written) excerpt from the prologue of Maggie Stiefvater's novel The Dream Thieves. Her insight on the nature of secrets is astounding. I love it!
Overall, I adored the exhibit. I was touched by many pieces, and it made me realize many societal and personal ignorances that I held. The entirety of the exhibit was eye-opening and fascinating. Each piece was well-presented and easy to look at. However, one thing I would have liked to see was a summary or description of the art accompanying the exhibit. The tour guide did a wonderful job of explaining to us of the meaning of the works, and yet I think I would have benefitted from a written description of the work.
And now for my personal favorite:
This piece, called The Times Atlas of The World, was created by Agustina Woodgate. The sanded world atlas was complete in 2012. The book is approximately two feet wide and one foot in length.
This creator of this piece is Argentinian, and the piece was created with regards to Latin America. In this region, geopolitical alliances are often shifting and unstable. The economies of many nations in Latin American are struggling, and some are tilting towards a trade alliance with China rather than the United States. The purpose of the author's creation of The Times Atlas of The World was to illustrate this altering geopolitical landscape. The piece is representational of the geopolitical culture of Latin America.
Surprisingly, I interpreted this art in a completely different way. At first glance and before our tour guide explained the artist's intention, I interpreted this piece as idealizing a notion that I hold very dear to my heart: do not attempt to understand the world through maps or photographs, shape your own ideas of our breathtaking world through your own adventurous experiences; see the world, interact with the world, for yourself, and don't take someone else's word for it. Woodgate diminished every line, every country's framework until all that was left was its core, and this way the viewer could fill in every inch for themselves. They could make every little discovery that was there to be made without the hinderance of preconceived ideologies. The world was mine to make of it what I wanted! It was fascinating. I was a bit off from the artist's intention, but hey, that's what makes art art, right?
My sketch of The Times Atlas of The World is here:
While my sketch is nowhere near the artistic richness of the original piece, it did allow me to appreciate certain aspects of Woodgate's work. First of all, the texture of the piece was very unique. Woodgate used sandpaper to grind down each and every page of this atlas so that the details and the lines of each page would dissipate. You could feel the settled dust on every page. To me, this inclusion of the dust creates a sense of nostalgia; the lines may still be there, but they have scattered to a hundred new places, and a not much more than a fleeting memory. In addition, the use of the sandpaper created blurred lines in the atlas, nothing was clear, concise, or contour about these edges. This creates a sense of mystery and adds to the fuzzy illustration of the geopolitical state of Latin America. The sandpaper also created a light color scheme. Every color's vibrance was mitigated. This created a mild, calm mood in me as the viewer. This comforting tone was interesting to me, it was as if the artist felt that there was no reason to panic. The atlas was also very thick with 515 pages of maps. The grand book was perfect for depicting the vastness of the world and how incredibly it can change.
All in all, it was a fabulous trip, a wonderful experience, and I will definitely be visiting CAM again!
I really like your analysis of the World Atlas. I too thought this piece was mesmerizing and so different compared to the others. I particularly appreciated the author's thought of erasing boundaries. Today in the world, we have many boundaries that separate us from each other. The idea of erasing them sounds like a good idea. The aesthetic ability of the artwork was soothing to me as well. The light tone and the transparent colors mixing with each other was calming to the eyes. The overall message was interesting too. The world is constantly changing, therefore this piece will forever accurately depict the world. Countries, cultures, and land without borders will continue to be a unique idea that will hopefully prevail over humankind.
ReplyDeleteI loved the piece of the World Atlas as well! I really agree with the fact that you mentioned that because the lines are blurred, it creates a sense of mystery. I'd have to agree with Sarah as well. Right after you said that the lines were blurred, I immediately thought about how in World War I and how the Allied powers didn't know how to separate people into states. There is so much history behind what makes individual who they are, and it's hard to group one type of person into one country that has had exactly the same historical and cultural influences as you. Just like Sarah said, it's like the artist wanted to "erase" those kinds of boundaries between people. Loved your blog!
ReplyDeleteWow, what an entry! I remember how much you said you loved the field trip and this post definitely backs up your enthusiasm. I loved the Temple of One Thousand Bells because it was so delicate and included the auditory piece as well. But the World Atlas was something else. I really liked your analysis of how the artist wanted to "erase" the physical boundaries. How do you think people, Americans in particular, would react to the United States' borders being erased? Would people see it like the way they see the countries in this piece? Or would we get a negative reaction? I had a great time reading your post!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your blogpost! I found it interesting how you included the perception of art and how each viewer can interpret a piece differently than the artist intended- very tok. From my viewing of the atlas piece I noticed the artist did not sand the index very well. Do you think this is significant due to being able to know what boundaries and such are on each page? The gallery attendant also said that the artist created another piece from all the sand from the atlas. Do you think the piece is incomplete without this aspect at the museum or more complete?
ReplyDelete